Thursday, December 10, 2009

Haircut Redux

Photobucket

Today Todd got a haircut at lunch, with the same woman, Nickie, that I went to last week. This is his third haircut with Nickie. She only charged him $21! Then Todd asked her why she charged me $43.95. She said the difference, the $23, was STYLING. Yea, I won't be getting that STYLING next time! So the "styling" cost MORE than the actual haircut itself? Unbelievable! No thanks. I'll just have a cut please. I could have done it myself!  :-|

7 comments:

  1. Browns, Browns, Browns, Browns, Browns, Browns!

    ReplyDelete
  2. That is unbelievable, styling more expensive than the cut itself! Wow.

    I got a haircut today, and I'm very happy with the result. It was about nine weeks since I last got a cut (normally I go every 6 weeks), so it was really needed. Now I'm ready for Christmas and New Year's parties. And so is Todd, I can see! =)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh brother! Well at least you have an answer and know how to avoid that next time. Just to make you feel better I just dropped $115 on my hair! But I get root color and foils which is never cheap. LOL Especially when it's every 9-10 weeks!

    ReplyDelete
  4. just a thanks!! I used your marvy 09 template...pulled out all my hair going thru pictures...but made our Christmas cards with it!
    http://www.digishoptalk.com/gallery/data/500/2009finalcmascard.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  5. wow Anne, it looks incredible! Thanks so much for sharing... I loved seeing it!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Did Todd get styling?

    Wow...$23 for styling. Well, I guess it's good to know now what the extra charge was. Wowzers!

    ReplyDelete
  7. unbelievable!! Sometimes you should be a man... LOL

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for stopping by! I love to hear from you!

[feedly mini]